Something in this little bit of questioning of Christianity, modern finance, and the 9/11 story was apparently too out-there even for a Wikipedia entry.
See the movie’s page, and its sources to get a sense of where it’s coming from… I’m not much on 9/11 ‘conspiracies’ — not because I think such evil is beyond the present gang of murdering, torturing criminals, but because I simply do not believe the Cheney Administration could have pulled off such a dazzling, flawless operation. But Wikipedia’s apparent disregard for materials that are not rendered “notable” by recognition from “official” sources is troubling. At best, it betrays a tremendous insecurity about its status. By suggesting that online cinema is not significant, aren’t they reinforcing the position of the Michael Gormans of the world, that online resources are inherently inferior?
It’s finds like this that make YouTube so great. And this video is somewhat timely for HotnStinky, because Craig Torso and I were just talking about Ayn Rand the other day.
If you like part I, then you must not be an idiot, so I can assume you can 1) doubleclick on the video, and 2) find parts II and III in the related videos section on that page.
The video is an irate viewers remix of this bizarre panel discussion on atheism hosted by Paula Zahn on CNN. Whoever made the video raises some interesting points.
